« Newer Older »

Concert Photography = Srs Bsns

 

I've posted blogs about "predatory" artist contracts and shooting restrictions in the past...

 

First Three No Flash, Oh yeah and give us all your pictures for free…

The dying art of gig photography: Today's concert photos strangled by restrictions

 

as well as one's about other artists who afforded greater creative freedom to their fans...

 

NIN relaxes policy on audience cameras/recording equipment

 

and an ongoing current discussion on Flickr's concert photography group

 

Photography releases are a pressing topic both to concert photographers, and managers trying to protect the band but ensure that they receive press coverage and high quality promotional material is run when they release a new album and start a touring cycle. Most releases I've seen simply state that photographs will be used for editorial purposes only... Some limit use to one publication and require permission before any photos are used elsewhere (still, for editorial use. I've only encountered one of those). 

 

I have never been presented with the following but was aware of it's existence with several other bands, and was dismayed to find out another band under the same management, who I intended to photograph, is now using this contract on their new tour. 

 

Note: Without a model release, in the US I am already only able to use photographs of a person for editorial (news) coverage and possibly limited print sales. In no case could I legally use their images on commercial products or advertising, print t-shirts or other merch etc. That's even without having a photo pass to a concert.

 

 


 

PHOTOGRAPHER RELEASE

Dated:________________________



I, __________________________________ (name of photographer) hereby agree to the following with respect to the photographs that I will take, or cause to be taken, of the musical group collectively known as (BAND NAME REMOVED)("you") on the date ______________, 2009 (the "Photos"):

1. I have the limited right and permission to use certain Photos that have been approved by you solely in connection with one (1) article about you contained in ________________________________ [State name of publication].
The Photos may be used only in an article, publication or other medium initially disseminated to the public within one year of the date of this agreement. I shall have no right to otherwise use or re-use the Photos in whole or in part, in any medium or for any purpose whatsoever, including, without limitation, promotion, advertising, and trade, without your written consent therefor.

2. I hereby acknowledge that you shall own all rights in the Photos, including the copyrights therein and thereto, and accordingly, I hereby grant, transfer, convey and assign to you all right, title and interest throughout the universe in perpetuity, including, without limitation, the copyright (and all renewals and extensions thereof), in and to the Photos. I agree that you shall have the right to exploit all or a part of the Photos in any and all media, now known or hereafter devised, throughout the universe, in perpetuity, in all configurations as you determine, without obtaining my consent and without any payment or consideration therefor. I understand that you will give me appropriate "photo credit" where possible. I understand further that all aspects of said "photo credit" shall be determined by you in your sole discretion and that failure to a ccord said "photo credit" shall not be deemed a breach of any obligation, express or implied. I further grant to you the right to use my name, likeness and biographical xxdata in connection with the distribution, exhibition, advertising and exploitation of the Photos. I will, upon request, execute, acknowledge and deliver to you such additional documents as you may deem necessary to evidence and effectuate your rights hereunder, and I hereby grant to you the right as attorney-in-fact to execute, acknowledge, deliver and record in the U.S. Copyright Office or elsewhere any and all such documents if I shall fail to execute same within five (5) days after so requested by you.

3. You may assign my rights under this agreement in whole or in part.

4. I hereby waive all rights of droit moral or "moral right of authors" or any similar rights or principles of law which I may now have or later have in the Photos. I warrant and represent that I have the right to execute this Certificate and that the Photos are and shall be new and original with me and shall be capable of copyright protection throughout the universe, that they do not and shall not violate or infringe upon any common law or statutory right of any party, or constitute unfair competition and are not now and shall not be the subject of any litigation. I shall indemnify and hold you, and your employees, officers, agents, assignees and licensees, harmless from and against any losses, costs, liabilities, claims, damages or expenses arising out of any claim by a third party which is inconsistent with any warranty or representation made by me in this Certificate.

5. This Certificate contains the entire understanding of the parties and will be governed by the laws of California in the United States of America applicable to contracts entered into in California in the United States of America.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this Certificate effective as of this ______ day of ___________________, 2009.


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
By: __________________________________________ ________________________________
Photographer Print or Type Name Here
(BAND NAME REMOVED)
By: __________________________________________
An Authorized Signatory o/b/o (BAND NAME REMOVED)

 

 


 

While this may indeed protect the artist (except from criticism over the contract!), there is no reason under the sun that any photographer in their right mind should sign this contract.

 

Even if you're not a professional photographer, just a fan of the band, and are dying to be able to photograph them with a real photo pass, you need to realize that:

1) You would not own any rights whatsoever to the photos taken at this show.

2) You could not post any of these photos on your personal website, myspace, or anywhere else.

3) You could not use any of these photos in your portfolio (if you wished to someday be a professional photographer or show your work.)

4) You could not print them out and give them to your friends and family.

5) You could not use them as reference to do drawings or painting based on them, or allow others to do so.

6) They could be published on websites/magazines without crediting you.

7) They could sell a poster or other merch with your images without paying you a fee or even crediting you as the person who took the photo.

8) They can use your name, photo and personal xxdata (including commercially or for advertising purposes) without your permission or compensating you.

9) If someone infringes on the rights you've granted them via this contract (example: you got a fan in one of the shots and they don't bother to get a release from that person before printing a poster, so they get sued) YOU are responsible for the legal fees/damages resulting from the lawsuit.

10) In the US Copyright lasts for the lifetime of the owner plus 50 years (70 years in some other countries). You may love a band, but the band's MANAGEMENT is the one administering this, and 10-15 years from now the person holding the rights to their material might not even BE the band, or anyone who you want to support in any way (example: Trent Reznor lost the rights to "Pretty Hate Machine" because of a bad business manager. Would you want your photographs potentially supporting someone other than the band?)

 

The only way to make these contracts go away (and hopefully be replaced by ones that respect both the band and the photographer) is if you DO NOT SIGN THEM.


Posted on 10/18/2009 8:33 PM Visits: 168
Ikky-ikky-arriba!: 10/18/2009 11:01 PM
Urgh this is so stupid. It seems to me that the music industry tries to do everything it can to control the property rights of absolutely everyone involved, from musicians, to songwriters, to photographers. It seems so insane they can subjucate a photographers rights to own the product of their own labour, when they dont even pay them for the rights.

Also, the legalese in that is so dense, no reasonable person could ever understand what it means at a cursory glance before being allowed to enter a press pit.
MiseryXchord™: 10/18/2009 11:47 PM
Buzznet's journal editor has decided to mutilate all the links in the above journal, and won't save my changes when I try to fix them. Sorry. There was some very intelligent commentary on these issues on those other posts.
all I wanted was you...: 10/19/2009 4:08 PM
Wow, I understand that their trying to protect the artist rights, but this is too far...
MiseryXchord™: 10/19/2009 10:33 PM
It might "protect" the artist but it creates considerable ill-will in other creators their management might want to keep a working relationship with... worse, because often if the photographer is shooting for a major outlet (I'm told that daily newspapers reject this entirely) the contract is waived or just disappears. So smaller outlets and photogs with less backing (even Buzznet) get forced into signing it when it's not even being applied consistently. The biggest problem is that it was completely out of the ordinary that a photog got this in advance of the show (and posted it on the net). Almost always these are presented to the photographer (who is almost always NOT empowered to make business decisions for his publisher) right before the show or even right before they enter the barricade to shoot.

Someone who spoke to managers of 2 bands using this kind of contract today said they use it to protect against the odd photog who's going to go out and try to make bootleg shirts and rip off the artist (again, there's a misunderstanding of editorial and commercial rights, I suspect)... and because they don't really look at photography as any sort of art (Hello, yes, I'm a monkey pushing a button and the camera makes the photo all by itself). Literally, that we're just taking the artist's image and using it for profit. After over 20 years in the publishing industry outside of music, I feel great that people I'm trying to build a working relationship with might actually think I'm a parasite. I don't really know how to address that when going about trying to get these contracts amended or (in the case of the above because there's NOTHING I'd agree to in it) waived. :(
kariinwonderland: 10/29/2009 1:09 PM
I love you! Thank you for posting all this stuff! This is the most ridiculous waiver I've ever seen...
jussijames: 10/30/2009 2:19 PM
If i'm on a PAID assigment then I don't think that it would bother me to sign a contract stating that the images are to be used basically as a one time media article. I mean if I'm not on a paid assignment and the contract comes up and i don't sign then doesn't it kind of force an paid exchange if the media wants images? Right? I would love to hear other opinions and sides to this as maybe I'm missing the point.
MiseryXchord™: 11/03/2009 3:10 PM
If i'm on a PAID assigment then I don't think that it would bother me to sign a contract stating that the images are to be used basically as a one time media article.
Unless you're getting paid enough by your media outlet to compensate you for a complete buy out of your rights for your entire lifetime plus 70 years, then you aren't getting paid enough to sign this. Photographs are often licensed years after they were originally taken, and licensed multiple times for multiple uses. The greatest number of photo requests the agency I shoot for and it's parent agency get are for old archival shots of The Beatles, Rolling Stones, old Jazz bands etc often 30-40 years old. Photos don't cease to have value after one article... also, this contract would take all unpublished images shot at that time, too.

The band/their management would also be able to use the images commercially with no compensation/credit to you. Is whatever you'd be paid by a website/magazine enough to make up for them printing one of your images on a poster and selling 5000 of them for $20 a piece without compensating or crediting you for the use? Or t-shirts? Or using it for product endorsements/ads? (also without even giving credit to you)

I mean if I'm not on a paid assignment and the contract comes up and i don't sign then doesn't it kind of force an paid exchange if the media wants images? Right? I would love to hear other opinions and sides to this as maybe I'm missing the point.
Not quite sure what you mean about forcing a paid exchange...?
kariinwonderland: 11/14/2009 3:35 PM
Thank you again for posting this! It was thrown at me in the nyc show and I'm glad I was prepared, so I crossed out everything and wrote no's all over the place
MiseryXchord™: 11/14/2009 7:29 PM
Thank you again for posting this! It was thrown at me in the nyc show and I'm glad I was prepared, so I crossed out everything and wrote no's all over the place
And they accepted it? Awesome!!! Tell Karen about it though, management told her Buzznet photogs weren't being required to sign that one.
kariinwonderland: 11/14/2009 10:11 PM

And they accepted it? Awesome!!! Tell Karen about it though, management told her Buzznet photogs weren't being required to sign that one.



Don't worry, I called her as soon as the girl at will call handed it to me...she's going to talk to whoever on Monday. Pretty sure the girl at will call had no idea what a release really is and she couldn't get any answers from anyone about why I had to sign so I told her I'd just hand it in with all my changes and cross outs and she didn't seem to think that meant anything and then gave me my pass.
MiseryXchord™: 11/14/2009 10:45 PM
Don't worry, I called her as soon as the girl at will call handed it to me...she's going to talk to whoever on Monday. Pretty sure the girl at will call had no idea what a release really is and she couldn't get any answers from anyone about why I had to sign so I told her I'd just hand it in with all my changes and cross outs and she didn't seem to think that meant anything and then gave me my pass.
Good!

And btw, your airborne shot of Davey jumping off Hunter's amps is SPECTACULAR! That's the sort of shot if I found I'd caught it when reviewing my images, I would've gotten up and done a little dance. Seriously.
kariinwonderland: 11/15/2009 8:39 AM

Good!

And btw, your airborne shot of Davey jumping off Hunter's amps is SPECTACULAR! That's the sort of shot if I found I'd caught it when reviewing my images, I would've gotten up and done a little dance. Seriously.

I had been intermittently been taking pix after I left the pit, and just kept the camera out to my side and only snapped a few at a time so it wouldn't look obvious, but as soon as he climbed up on that, the camera was up and ready. I think I breathed a quick sigh of relief that I caught it and then went back to hoping the damn thing was really in focus on something bigger than the camera screen!
Add Comment
This person only allows registered users to leave comments. You must sign up or sign in to comment.
ARCHIVE
112220091504
My Happy DOOM-cake!
Backyard visitor...
MY FRIENDS


Miseryxchord's Journal Widgets:
RSS | ATOM | JavaScript
Buzz Feed