Concert Photography = Srs Bsns
I've posted blogs about "predatory" artist contracts and shooting restrictions in the past...
First Three No Flash, Oh yeah and give us all your pictures for free… The dying art of gig photography: Today's concert photos strangled by restrictions
as well as one's about other artists who afforded greater creative freedom to their fans...
NIN relaxes policy on audience cameras/recording equipment
and an ongoing current discussion on Flickr's concert photography group
Photography releases are a pressing topic both to concert photographers, and managers trying to protect the band but ensure that they receive press coverage and high quality promotional material is run when they release a new album and start a touring cycle. Most releases I've seen simply state that photographs will be used for editorial purposes only... Some limit use to one publication and require permission before any photos are used elsewhere (still, for editorial use. I've only encountered one of those).
I have never been presented with the following but was aware of it's existence with several other bands, and was dismayed to find out another band under the same management, who I intended to photograph, is now using this contract on their new tour.
Note: Without a model release, in the US I am already only able to use photographs of a person for editorial (news) coverage and possibly limited print sales. In no case could I legally use their images on commercial products or advertising, print t-shirts or other merch etc. That's even without having a photo pass to a concert.
PHOTOGRAPHER RELEASE
While this may indeed protect the artist (except from criticism over the contract!), there is no reason under the sun that any photographer in their right mind should sign this contract.
Even if you're not a professional photographer, just a fan of the band, and are dying to be able to photograph them with a real photo pass, you need to realize that: 1) You would not own any rights whatsoever to the photos taken at this show. 2) You could not post any of these photos on your personal website, myspace, or anywhere else. 3) You could not use any of these photos in your portfolio (if you wished to someday be a professional photographer or show your work.) 4) You could not print them out and give them to your friends and family. 5) You could not use them as reference to do drawings or painting based on them, or allow others to do so. 6) They could be published on websites/magazines without crediting you. 7) They could sell a poster or other merch with your images without paying you a fee or even crediting you as the person who took the photo. 8) They can use your name, photo and personal xxdata (including commercially or for advertising purposes) without your permission or compensating you. 9) If someone infringes on the rights you've granted them via this contract (example: you got a fan in one of the shots and they don't bother to get a release from that person before printing a poster, so they get sued) YOU are responsible for the legal fees/damages resulting from the lawsuit. 10) In the US Copyright lasts for the lifetime of the owner plus 50 years (70 years in some other countries). You may love a band, but the band's MANAGEMENT is the one administering this, and 10-15 years from now the person holding the rights to their material might not even BE the band, or anyone who you want to support in any way (example: Trent Reznor lost the rights to "Pretty Hate Machine" because of a bad business manager. Would you want your photographs potentially supporting someone other than the band?)
The only way to make these contracts go away (and hopefully be replaced by ones that respect both the band and the photographer) is if you DO NOT SIGN THEM.
|
ARCHIVE
November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 MY FRIENDS
PanasonicYouth
shalua phoenix82 blaqkcadillac djscribbles JargonTalk © janicethemenace rockinponda heartsapocolypse Gabriel's Gonna Rollerblade beatofthedrum Ikky-ikky-arriba! FOLLOWERS ALL FRIENDS Miseryxchord's Journal Widgets: RSS | ATOM | JavaScript |



Also, the legalese in that is so dense, no reasonable person could ever understand what it means at a cursory glance before being allowed to enter a press pit.
Someone who spoke to managers of 2 bands using this kind of contract today said they use it to protect against the odd photog who's going to go out and try to make bootleg shirts and rip off the artist (again, there's a misunderstanding of editorial and commercial rights, I suspect)... and because they don't really look at photography as any sort of art (Hello, yes, I'm a monkey pushing a button and the camera makes the photo all by itself). Literally, that we're just taking the artist's image and using it for profit. After over 20 years in the publishing industry outside of music, I feel great that people I'm trying to build a working relationship with might actually think I'm a parasite. I don't really know how to address that when going about trying to get these contracts amended or (in the case of the above because there's NOTHING I'd agree to in it) waived. :(
The band/their management would also be able to use the images commercially with no compensation/credit to you. Is whatever you'd be paid by a website/magazine enough to make up for them printing one of your images on a poster and selling 5000 of them for $20 a piece without compensating or crediting you for the use? Or t-shirts? Or using it for product endorsements/ads? (also without even giving credit to you)
Not quite sure what you mean about forcing a paid exchange...?
Don't worry, I called her as soon as the girl at will call handed it to me...she's going to talk to whoever on Monday. Pretty sure the girl at will call had no idea what a release really is and she couldn't get any answers from anyone about why I had to sign so I told her I'd just hand it in with all my changes and cross outs and she didn't seem to think that meant anything and then gave me my pass.
And btw, your airborne shot of Davey jumping off Hunter's amps is SPECTACULAR! That's the sort of shot if I found I'd caught it when reviewing my images, I would've gotten up and done a little dance. Seriously.
I had been intermittently been taking pix after I left the pit, and just kept the camera out to my side and only snapped a few at a time so it wouldn't look obvious, but as soon as he climbed up on that, the camera was up and ready. I think I breathed a quick sigh of relief that I caught it and then went back to hoping the damn thing was really in focus on something bigger than the camera screen!