October 20, 2009Shalua's kittens need new homes
We're looking for homes for Shalua's kittens (now grown cats). Our city is so overcrowded with homeless cats (there're a dozen running loose on our block from the same source as the ones we rescued) that we couldn't find anyone to adopt them and the shelter automatically kills everything that's dropped off because they're overcrowded and cannot find homes for the cats they already have. Every home we had lined up has fallen through... they decided they didn't want more cats, someone gave them an adorable kitten and they didn't want another, someone wanted an outside cat because the coyotes ate hers (FUCK THAT).
Unfortunately, my evil cat-hating home nurse (who didn't like my 3 old cats sitting in the living room) instead of turning my case over to someone else, simply stopped coming to change my IV (causing my IV to go too long without a change and rupture one day in my kitchen. I'm considering suing the shit out of them at the moment) and called animal control saying I had "unhealthy cats", because she thinks my having any cats at all is unhealthy in my condition. Passive aggressive much? (In case you missed the back story, I have Lyme Disease, yes I was bit by a tick while camping, they didn't catch it in time, I have to take IV antibiotics every day until I die, basically) So now I suddenly have to find them homes NOW.
They're sweet cats, and they need INDOOR homes (without dogs), 2 of the brothers are pure white and go limp when you pick them up (like rag dolls). One of them is EXACTLY like Shalua, but bigger. The other 3 brothers are grey, black and tabby. They like to roll on my wool carpets from Afghanistan (smell like sheep I guess?) and chase furry mice. They are all extremely people oriented, but shy of large men and loud noises.
If you know anyone in Southern California who has been looking for a cat and thinking long term about what adopting one is going to mean (not going off to college in a year and planning to dump them on the 'rents, moving to Peru as a foreign exchange student, marrying some girl with a rottweiler) I could really use some help right now...
Posted on 10/20/2009 2:46 PM Comments (13)
October 18, 2009Concert Photography = Srs Bsns
I've posted blogs about "predatory" artist contracts and shooting restrictions in the past...
First Three No Flash, Oh yeah and give us all your pictures for free… The dying art of gig photography: Today's concert photos strangled by restrictions
as well as one's about other artists who afforded greater creative freedom to their fans...
NIN relaxes policy on audience cameras/recording equipment
and an ongoing current discussion on Flickr's concert photography group
Photography releases are a pressing topic both to concert photographers, and managers trying to protect the band but ensure that they receive press coverage and high quality promotional material is run when they release a new album and start a touring cycle. Most releases I've seen simply state that photographs will be used for editorial purposes only... Some limit use to one publication and require permission before any photos are used elsewhere (still, for editorial use. I've only encountered one of those).
I have never been presented with the following but was aware of it's existence with several other bands, and was dismayed to find out another band under the same management, who I intended to photograph, is now using this contract on their new tour.
Note: Without a model release, in the US I am already only able to use photographs of a person for editorial (news) coverage and possibly limited print sales. In no case could I legally use their images on commercial products or advertising, print t-shirts or other merch etc. That's even without having a photo pass to a concert.
PHOTOGRAPHER RELEASE
While this may indeed protect the artist (except from criticism over the contract!), there is no reason under the sun that any photographer in their right mind should sign this contract.
Even if you're not a professional photographer, just a fan of the band, and are dying to be able to photograph them with a real photo pass, you need to realize that: 1) You would not own any rights whatsoever to the photos taken at this show. 2) You could not post any of these photos on your personal website, myspace, or anywhere else. 3) You could not use any of these photos in your portfolio (if you wished to someday be a professional photographer or show your work.) 4) You could not print them out and give them to your friends and family. 5) You could not use them as reference to do drawings or painting based on them, or allow others to do so. 6) They could be published on websites/magazines without crediting you. 7) They could sell a poster or other merch with your images without paying you a fee or even crediting you as the person who took the photo. 8) They can use your name, photo and personal xxdata (including commercially or for advertising purposes) without your permission or compensating you. 9) If someone infringes on the rights you've granted them via this contract (example: you got a fan in one of the shots and they don't bother to get a release from that person before printing a poster, so they get sued) YOU are responsible for the legal fees/damages resulting from the lawsuit. 10) In the US Copyright lasts for the lifetime of the owner plus 50 years (70 years in some other countries). You may love a band, but the band's MANAGEMENT is the one administering this, and 10-15 years from now the person holding the rights to their material might not even BE the band, or anyone who you want to support in any way (example: Trent Reznor lost the rights to "Pretty Hate Machine" because of a bad business manager. Would you want your photographs potentially supporting someone other than the band?)
The only way to make these contracts go away (and hopefully be replaced by ones that respect both the band and the photographer) is if you DO NOT SIGN THEM.
Posted on 10/18/2009 8:33 PM Comments (12)
October 1, 2009Spin EARTH copyright FAIL
"As a SPIN Earth registered individual/user you may submit content. User submitted content includes videos, photos, text, and comments and are collectively referred to as "User Submissions." For clarity, you retain all of your ownership rights in your User Submissions. However, submitting your material, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which you hereby acknowledge, you hereby grant to SPIN Earth (SPIN Media, LLC) and its affiliates a non-exclusive, perpetual, worldwide license to edit, telecast, rerun, reproduce, use, create derivative works from, syndicate, license, print, sublicense, distribute and otherwise exhibit the materials you submit, or any portion thereof in any manner and in any medium or forum, whether now known or hereafter devised, without payment to you or any third party."
Seriously, I can sign up to your site, write reviews/posts or blog photos, and you'd be able to print them in your magazine and elsewhere FOR FREE, FOREVER?
Just no.
Websites need to stop pulling this crap, and keep their "use" of your posted content to that necessary to publish the site... which used to be the norm for user agreements... instead of exploiting their users for the possibility of adding to a media archive they can use as free crowd sourced content down the road on their other projects/sites.
Posted on 10/01/2009 10:12 AM Comments (0)
|
ARCHIVE
November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 MY FRIENDS
PanasonicYouth
shalua phoenix82 blaqkcadillac djscribbles JargonTalk © janicethemenace rockinponda heartsapocolypse Gabriel's Gonna Rollerblade beatofthedrum Ikky-ikky-arriba! FOLLOWERS ALL FRIENDS |



